|
We invite you to stop by
and visit us at our booth at the
43rd Annual Wisconsin
International Trade Conference
GROWING
GLOBALLY
May
15, 2007
Italian
Community Center - Milwaukee WI
Registration & Information at the MMAC
website
http://www.mmac.org/display/router.asp?DocID=757
RECEPTION 4:00 - 6:00 PM – Italian Community Center Atrium
Compliments of:
Bentley-World Packaging Ltd.
M.E. Dey & Co. Inc.
Pilot Air Freight
U.S. Bank
You may attend
without being registered for the conference.
We have two iPod Shuffle winners of our
April newsletter quiz question
Tami Miracle from Alliance Laundry and Janell Smith of Lesaffrey
Yeast Corporation.
The ‘minor league’ Brewers televised a game against the Toledo Mud
Hens on April 28, 1947. The Brewers had a close relationship with
the Boston Braves (later to be the Milwaukee Braves!) and the
Chicago Cubs. Detroit Tigers and the Chicago White Sox where
also acceptable. |
|
U.S.
Now Requiring Truck Drivers to File Electronic Manifests at All
Southern Land Border Ports
Thursday, April 19,
2007
Washington—Beginning
today, all truck carriers are required to electronically submit
manifests detailing cargo and carrier information to U.S. Customs
and Border Protection prior to arrival at any southern U.S. land
border ports of entry. By allowing the truck carrier to begin
import procedures in advance, drivers may shorten administrative
time at the border, potentially leading to expedited border
crossings for the approximately 21,000 trucks that cross the
southern U.S. border each day.
Until now
truck drivers have arrived at the border and presented CBP
officers with a paper manifest that details information on the
cargo being transported, the truck and trailer carrying the cargo
and the driver. The manifest must then be processed by CBP while
the driver waits. However, when a carrier files an electronic
manifest, CBP officers can begin processing the truck before it
arrives at the port.
Requiring
manifest information to be submitted electronically greatly
reduces the potential for errors and improves efficiency,
resulting in faster border crossings for legitimate carriers. With
e-manifests, time-consuming paper processes are eliminated,
truckers spend less time waiting at the border, and goods make
their way to market faster—all of which provide positive economic
benefits for both the United States and Mexico.
The
e-manifest capability is available at all ports featuring the
Automated Commercial Environment, the commercial trade processing
system being developed by CBP. Since January 2007 e-manifest
filing rates at Arizona, California, Texas and New Mexico land
border ports have grown steadily, from approximately 5,500
e-manifests filed in January to more than 32,000 in March.
This
significant increase in the e-manifest participation rate by
carriers on the southern border illustrates that they have been
planning and preparing for the mandatory use of e-manifests. Now
that the policy is in effect, CBP expects e-manifests to further
facilitate and expedite the crossings of legitimate southern
border carriers.
For more
information on ACE, e-mail
CBP.CSPO@dhs.gov or
visit the ACE: Modernization Information Systems section of the
CBP web site.
ACE: Modernization Information
Systems
http://www.cbp.gov/xp/cgov/toolbox/about/modernization/
return to front page
CBP
to Require Use of ACE Truck Manifest System at New Hampshire,
North Dakota and Vermont Ports of Entry
Monday, April 23, 2007
Washington—Effective
July 12, truck carriers entering the United States through land
border ports in Vermont and New Hampshire and at the ports of St.
John, Fortuna, Ambrose, Carbury, Noonan, Dunseith, Sherwood,
Antler, Northgate, Westhope and Portal in the state of North
Dakota will be required to transmit electronic manifests through
the Automated Commercial Environment (ACE).
U.S. Customs
and Border Protection has developed the ACE program to protect the
United States from terrorism while expediting lawful trade.
Currently,
filing of ACE e-manifests is required at land border ports on the
southern border, in the state of Washington and the ports of
Pembina, Neche, Walhalla, Maida, Hannah, Sarles and Hansboro in
North Dakota. It will be expanded on May 24 to Michigan and New
York, and further expanded on July 12 to Vermont, New Hampshire
and the remaining land border ports in North Dakota. Eventually,
the transmission of e-manifest through ACE will be required at all
land border ports of entry.
Before
e-manifest, truck drivers have arrived at the border and presented
CBP officers with a paper manifest that details information on the
cargo being transported, the truck and trailer carrying the cargo
and the driver. The manifest must then be processed by CBP while
the driver waits. With e-manifest, CBP officers are able to
pre-screen trucks and shipments, and dedicate more time to
inspecting suspicious cargo without delaying the border crossings
of legitimate carriers.
For more
information on this announcement, visit the CBP legal Web site.
(
Advance
Electronic Presentation of Cargo Information for Truck Carriers
Required To Be Transmitted Through ACE Truck Manifest at Ports in
the States of Vermont, North Dakota and New Hampshire
) For information on ACE, please e-mail
CBP.CSPO@dhs.gov or
visit the CBP modernization Web site. (
ACE:
Modernization Information Systems )
return to front page
Changes at FDA
27 Mar
2007, JOC
At a recent trade association
program, Michael Mullen, the assistant commissioner of
international affairs and trade relations for Customs and Border
Protection, recommended that other federal agencies undertake
three specific steps to enhance trade facilitation while at the
same time giving due regard to ever-shrinking budgets and staffing
and equipment levels.
The steps:
1. Move to a post-entry environment;
2. Move to a paperless environment; and
3. Fully participate in ITDS.
For those not familiar with it,
ITDS, the International Trade Data System, is an
under-construction computer portal and part of the Automated
Commercial Environment through which data would be transmitted to
the U.S. government and, by its own programming, the system would
automatically share that data with all the participating agencies
which have jurisdiction over a particular import transaction.
The goal is to have all the
federal agencies which touch on imports [and exports] participate.
Some have been slower than others, although the Food & Drug
Administration does have a representative on the ITDS board and
has for some time.
What Mullen recommended was a
really trusted trader program. Later at the same event, we learned
how FDA is putting its own spin on trade facilitation. The speaker
was David Horowitz, deputy associate commissioner for compliance
policy.
There will be one associate
commissioner for regulatory affairs and another for compliance.
Regulatory Affairs will oversee operations and budget, while
Compliance will oversee Policy and Risk Management and the Office
of Enforcement, both civil and criminal. An Office of Imports,
established under Regulatory Affairs, will oversee Import
Operations and the Prior Notice Center. It will centrally manage
entry review by setting policy. There is a hint of centralizing
the actual review of entries, but that does not appear to be in
FDA’s immediate plans.
We have to hope that by
centralizing policy, clearer guidance will be given to the FDA’s
staff so shipments will move faster and regulations and
requirements will be better understood inside and outside the
agency.
Even while the reorganization
itself is months or more off, FDA’s Import strategy in the near
term will be focused on foreign operations, entry
admissibility/border operations, domestic operations, information
technology and applied sciences and technology.
With these efforts, FDA is
beginning a serious move towards risk assessment. The outcome
should be to free up the agency’s assets to spend only limited
time on compliant goods (generally in the post-entry audit
environment), while focusing on high risk and non-compliant goods.
Importers, therefore, can expect heightened expectations to
provide even more reliable information. FDA has even said that it
wants to release compliant goods and have more coordination and
collaboration with importers, as well as other regulators (e.g.,
state agencies) and stakeholders.
In implementing risk management,
FDA plans to focus on fraud and economic adulteration (using
inferior, cheaper ingredients to cheat consumers and undercut
competition), while auditing low risk areas.
Another interesting
idea is virtual inspections. … In the face of ever diminishing
budgets, FDA is looking at maximizing its IT capability through
virtual inspections. The plan is to review documentation and
information at FDA headquarters instead of dispatching staff out
of the country, and if necessary, FDA will ask the host country to
conduct the inspection and advise its results.
As with all such plans, the proof
is in the implementation. Nonetheless, FDA is to be applauded for
its efforts to modernize, but keep its professional and technical
standards in tact and meeting its current high standards.
return to front page |
|
Information regarding freight
rates
Many
of you have inquired about the pending rate increases scheduled to
be implemented by the freight carriers. It is typical for all
carriers to renegotiate their rates and contracts in May of each
year. At this time, all information is still preliminary. We
recognize the impact these increases have on your business. The
following is a list of the projected GRI (General Rate
Increase) that is scheduled to become effective on May 15, 2007. As
always, we will act in your best interest in providing the best
service options at the lowest available cost. The below
costs are highest
possible increases to current rates on file:
GENERAL RATE INCREASE (GRI) Effective: 15May2007
From: Asia Origin Ports Notes 1, 2, 3
To: USA Destination Ports and Points as noted below
|
DESTINATION
PC-BP/GROUP 4
|
AMOUNT PER CONTAINER
USD240/20'
USD300/40'
USD340/40'HC
USD380/45'
|
|
IPI/MLB |
USD520/20'
USD650/40'
USD730/40'HC
USD825/45' |
|
ALL WATER/RIPI |
USD400/20'
USD500/40'
USD565/40'HC
USD635/45'
|
NOTES:
1. PC-BP means Pacific Coast Base Ports; GROUP 4 US Inland Points in
US Western States are defined in Rule 1-B1; GRI as shown herein will apply
on rates applicable to this port group and on rates to individual ports within this
group, and to Group 4 Points.
2. IPI/MLB means Inland Point Intermodal and MiniLandBridge GRI as shown
herein will apply on all rates applicable to US Inland Points served via PC-BP,
and to all rates applicable to US Atlantic & Gulf Ports served via PC-BP.
3. ALL WATER/RIPI means All Water Service to US Atlantic & Gulf Ports
(USAG) via Panama Canal, and RIPI means Reverse IPI Service to US Inland
Points via USAG; GRI as shown will apply on rates to these ports and points.
|
PSS
All
shipments to the below listed ports shall be subject to the
following:
PEAK SEASON SURCHARGE (PSS) FOR 2007
From:
North East Asia & South East Asia
To: USA Ports and Points
Effective: 15JUN2007 thru 28FEB2008
$300 per 20’
container
$400 per 40’ container
$450 per 40’ high cube container
$505 per 45’ container
That the Bunker Adjustment Factor (BAF) will be adjusted to
below quantum for all shipments
originating in
Far East (China, Hong
Kong, Taiwan, Japan, Korea, Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia,
Singapore
&
Vietnam) to all USA
destinations with effective from 1st of
June 2007
:-
Quantum:
- USD
475
/ 590 / 665 for 20' / 40' / 40'HC (Remarks:
Currently we apply special BAF at quantum of USD235/310/350 per
20'/40'/40'HC until
15 May 2007 and
subject to change afterwards)
If you have any questions
regarding the above information please contact your M.E.
Dey representative at 414-747-7000 |
return to front page
|
U.S.
Ranks Second in World Maritime Container Traffic, According to New
BTS Report
Apr 26, 2007
News Report
The United
States ranks second in world maritime container traffic with one
in nine maritime containers in the world either bound for or
coming from the United States, according to
"America's Container Ports: Delivering the Goods," a
new report from the Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS).
BTS, a part of the
U.S. Department of Transportation's Research and Innovative
Technology Administration, reported that U.S.-container trade in
2005 and 2006 was more than double the trade of a decade earlier.
An estimated 46.3 million 20-foot equivalent units (TEU's -- the
standard measure for counting containers of various sizes) passed
through U.S. ports in 2006, up from 22.6 million in 1996.
Two-thirds of the containers are imported into the United States.
During that time,
world container trade more than tripled, resulting in a decline in
the U.S. share of world container trade from 16 per cent to 11
percent. China has exceeded the U.S. share of world container
trade since 1998.
Other findings of
the BTS report:
Container traffic in the United States is becoming more
concentrated as larger, faster and more specialized vessels call
at the limited number of ports capable of handling them. The top
10 U.S. container ports accounted for 85 percent of U.S.
containerized traffic in 2005, measured in TEUs, up from 78
percent in 1995.
Over half, nearly 55 percent, of U.S. containerized merchandise
trade in terms of TEUs passed through west coast ports in 2005, up
from 42 percent in 1980.
U.S. maritime ports are handling larger container vessels,
measured by the average vessel size per call. The average size per
call of container vessels calling at U.S. ports was nearly 45,000
deadweight tons (dwt) in 2005, up from 38,000 dwt in 2000.
Overall, nearly 26 million containers of various sizes entered the
United States by all modes of transportation in 2005, up 37
percent from 19 million in 2000. Of those containers, more than 15
million entered the nation by truck and rail from Canada and
Mexico in 2005 while the remaining 11 million were oceanborne.
"America's
Container Ports: Delivering the Goods," is BTS' first stand-alone
container report. The report is available at
http://www.bts.gov/publications/americas_container_ports/.
return to front page
Cargo costs set record as world runs short of ships
28-Apr-2007
Source: business.timesonline.co.u
Cargo freight
rates are soaring as the world runs out of ships to satisfy the
extraordinary craving for fuel, grain and metals.
The Baltic Exchange’s Dry Cargo Index reached a record high of
6,230 points yesterday as the market responded to the shortage by
propelling the cost of shipping to record levels. The Dry Cargo
Index’s previous peak was at 6,208 points in December 2004.
The
daily rate for the largest vessels, known as capesize – capable of
carrying 172,000 tonnes of cargo – reached $106,289 yesterday,
while panamax rates, for vessels that can carry up to 74,000
tonnes, reached $47,100 a day.
Jeremy Penn, chief executive of the Baltic Exchange, said that the
continuing strength of Chinese demand for coal and iron ore was
propelling rates higher. The China factor, “coupled with delays in
Australian ports and a weak dollar, have given the freight markets
a boost”, Mr Penn said.
China’s increasing impact on the commodity markets was having
knock-on effects on third countries. Japan and South Korea are now
sourcing raw materials from countries farther away, such as
Australia, Brazil and Indonesia, leading to longer sea voyages and
leaving fewer ships available for charter.
Increasing volatility in the underlying physical market for
vessels is having the additional effect of driving up volumes in
the recently created derivatives market. The derivatives market
uses Baltic Exchange indices to settle future contracts.
Until the recent surge in activity, the Dry Cargo Index had traded
in a range between 500 and 2,500 points from 1985 to 2003.
return to front page
BILLS OF LADING
Bills of lading contain the name of the
shipper, the importer and a notify party – usually the Customs
broker. C-TPAT security recommendation – do not put the name
of the forwarder as the shipper or the importer. The
forwarder may be a second notify. The name of the shipper
should be the entity that prepared the goods for shipping on to
you. This should include the full name and address.
U.S. shipping firms may stop upgrading work in Asia
28-Apr-2007
Source: www.ndtvprofit.com
NEW YORK -
Growing pressure on the U.S. government to enforce rules
prohibiting overseas upgrading and rebuilding of U.S. ships may
start deterring shipowners from skirting the law and having the
work done in Asia, industry sources said on Friday.
The U.S.
shipping fleet is protected by the Jones Act, which requires U.S.
ownership, construction and crew for all coastal waterborne
commerce. The Jones Act fleet is estimated to be about 150
vessels.
The
Shipbuilders Council of America and Pasha Hawaii Transport Lines
has sued the U.S. Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security and
National Vessel Documentation Center at the Eastern District Court
of Virginia to stop a three-ship conversion plan in China by
shipowner Matson.
"There will be less incentives for shipowners to send their U.S.
blue water ships to Asia for dry docking or the five-year survey
if they can't do any major upgrading work," said Allen Walker,
president of the Shipbuilders Council of America.
"The rules and regulations are very clear: You are not allowed to
install a major component in more than a certain percentage of the
ship's weight," he said.
The
U.S. Coast Guard said last year that it does not inspect the
upgraded ships for compliance with the regulations upon the
vessels' return from overseas shipyards. The Coast Guard operates
under the assumption that the heavy penalty imposed when foreign
rebuilding and upgrading is done should serve as a deterrent to
potential offenders.
"Hopefully, the lawsuits will make people think a few times before
sending their ships overseas for rebuilding and modifications,"
Walker said. "And hopefully, more ship rebuilding work can be done
at the U.S. shipyards."
Walker estimated about 15 ships, or half of the U.S. ships that
need dry docking or maintenance work every year, head to Asia
because it is cheaper.
During the regular maintenance, which is carried out every five
years, some shipowners order upgrading and rebuilding.
A
U.S. ship owner said that he was offered by a Chinese shipyard a
price of $1.50 a kilogram to replace wasted steel on his ships.
The price includes the steel and labor cost. "You can't even get
the steel alone for $1.50 a kilogram in the U.S.," he said.
return to front page |
|
When classifying goods for export, two schedules may be used.
Exporters may use
the Harmonized Tariff system of the United States (HS) or the
Schedule B. For nearly all exported goods, we recommend using the
HS. Since the HS is the only schedule that may be used for
imports, it is sensible to use one schedule for both imports and
exports. There are however some HS numbers that may not be used
in exports. Below is a table of the sub-headings that should be
looked at carefully – you may look up the appropriate Schedule B
number through the Department of Census
(see following
article).
The headings refer to the following general descriptions: Coal,
electricity, tobacco, fluorides, polymers, cotton, copper,
turbines, turbojets and propellers, other work trucks, molds,
articles for transmission, broadcasting, television, radio
signals. Radar and navigation equipment, parts for planes
and compasses.
|
0206.29 |
0206.49 |
0207.14 |
0207.27 |
0303.79 |
0303.79 |
0504.00 |
|
0713.33 |
0813.40 |
1005.90 |
1209.29 |
1209.30 |
1601.00 |
1602.31 |
|
1602.32 |
1701.99 |
1901.20 |
2401.10 |
2401.20 |
2401.30 |
2704.00 |
|
2716.00 |
2826.19 |
3901.10 |
5201.00 |
5201.00 |
7401.00 |
7404.00 |
|
8411.11 |
8411.12 |
8411.21 |
8411.22 |
8411.81 |
8411.91 |
8411.99 |
|
8427.20 |
8427.90 |
8480.71 |
8525.50 |
8525.60 |
8526.10 |
8526.91 |
|
8527.99 |
8803.10 |
8803.20 |
8803.30 |
8803.90 |
9014.10 |
|
The Department of Census has upgraded its online Schedule B search
engine.
Try it out at
http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/schedules/b/index.html#search
This page has an FAQ on the Schedule B. |
|
Secure Freight Initiative Begins Testing at Two Foreign Ports
Wednesday, April 11, 2007
Washington, D.C.
– The
Departments of Homeland Security and Energy announced today that
operational testing is underway in Honduras and Pakistan to
strengthen global supply chain security by scanning shipping
containers for nuclear or radiological materials before they are
allowed to depart for the United States. The tests represent the
initial phase of the Secure Freight Initiative announced Dec. 7,
2006, which involves the deployment of nuclear detection devices
to six foreign ports.
“Terrorists and criminals use global shipping networks, and we are
deploying multiple layers of advanced technology to counter their
tactics,” said Homeland Security Deputy Secretary Michael Jackson.
“Secure Freight creates a global nuclear detection network with
shippers, carriers and foreign allies to head off the worst
possible form of attack, a nuclear or dirty bomb on our soil. We
are deeply grateful to the governments of Honduras and Pakistan,
as well as our other Secure Freight Initiative partners, for their
strong leadership on this effort.”
“As
we continue our partnership with DHS and our international allies,
we continue to strengthen our national security. It is through
this important work at foreign ports that we improve the overall
security of the global maritime shipping network and hinder
terrorists from smuggling in a nuclear device or dangerous
material into a U.S. port,” said Thomas D'Agostino, DOE National
Nuclear Security Administration acting head. “By teaming up with
DHS in this important effort, NNSA is helping to bring our
extensive overseas nuclear security and detection expertise to
strengthen a key layer of our national defense.”
Secure Freight Initiative testing in Puerto Cortes, Honduras,
started on April 2. Tests in Port Qasim, Pakistan, the first port
to participate in Secure Freight Initiative, began in March. Four
other Secure Freight Initiative ports are expected to initiate
tests this year. They are: Southampton in the United Kingdom;
Salalah in Oman; Port of Singapore; and the Gamman Terminal at
Port Busan in Korea.
Data gathered from overseas scanning of U.S.-bound containers will
be transmitted in near real-time to U.S. Customs and Border
Protection Officers working in overseas ports and to the National
Targeting Center. The data will be combined with other risk
assessment information to improve analysis, targeting and scrutiny
of high-risk containers. All alarms from radiation detection
equipment will be resolved locally, and protocols are being
developed with host governments that may include instructing
carriers not to load a container until the risk is fully resolved.
DHS
and DOE, through its National Nuclear Security Administration,
will contribute roughly $60 million to the Secure Freight
Initiative for the installation of radiation detection devices and
communications infrastructure that transmit data back to the
United States. DOE will invest approximately $4 million in Puerto
Cortes for detection devices and an integrated communications
system that links new assets with existing equipment.
return to front page
U.S. Asks China to Help Maintain Global Maritime Security
(Yahoo!
News)
“The United States [on April 4] asked China to
join a global effort to maintain international maritime security,
as the Pentagon welcomed Beijing’s navy chief Vice Admiral Wu Shengli on a rare visit,” reports Agence France-Presse. “Admiral
Michael Mullen, the US chief of naval operations, called on Wu to
consider ‘China’s potential participation in global maritime
partnership initiatives’ … Mullen was referring to the ‘1,000-ship
Navy’ concept … aimed at building—on a voluntary basis—a
transnational network of navies, the shipping industry and law
enforcement agencies to respond to crises or emergencies at sea.…
Wu ‘expressed interest’ in the 1,000-ship Navy plan.”
return to front page
New this week in the
Journal of Homeland Security
In “Satellite
Control and the Future of Container Security,” Jim
Giermanski, Ed.D., professor and director of the Centre for Global
Commerce at Belmont Abbey College, as well as chairman of the
board of Powers International, Inc., discusses the role of
satellites in container security as well as the shortcomings of
radio-frequency identification as a container security measure.

Coast
Guard Now Tracking All Large Commercial Vessels in U.S. Waters
The U.S. Coast Guard met the April 1 deadline mandated by the SAFE
Port Act of 2006 to track all large commercial vessels within U.S.
waters. “Beyond the SAFE Port Act, we need to focus our attention
on closing other gaps in maritime security, including long-range
tracking of vessels outside U.S. waters and coming to grips with
potential threats posed by smaller vessels,” said Coast Guard
Commandant Thad Allen. The International Maritime Organization’s
long-range identification and tracking system will be able to
track more than 40,000 ships worldwide by the end of 2008, and the
United States will be able to track ships navigating within 1,000
nautical miles of the coast.
SAFE PORT ACT
This bill, signed
into law by the President in December, 2006 has important security
initiatives that relate directly to the Import process. These
security initiatives are primarily focused on preventing the
introduction of weapons of mass destruction into the United
States.
The
SAFE Port Act
requires CBP to obtain additional information for improved
high-risk targeting. That is, CBP is to seek out advanced
information about cargo destined for importation into
the United States before it is loaded on ships at foreign ports.
CBP intends to fulfill its responsibility through the enhancement
of the 24 hour rule. Its proposed requirements: so-called “10
+ 2” call for an additional dozen data elements describing the
shipment
24 hours prior
to vessel loading.
10 of the elements describe the shipment, the last 2 describe the
vessel stow plan and container status message. The 10 data
elements are:
-
Manufacturer
name and address
-
Seller name and
address
-
Container
stuffing location
-
Consolidator
name and address
-
Buyer name and
address
-
Ship to name and
address
-
Importer of
record number
-
Consignee number
-
Country of
origin of the goods
-
Commodity
Harmonized Tariff Schedule number
The final details and look of the program have not
been settled. However, CBP is on a fast track and wishes to move
quickly towards implementation. We expect this program will be
fully operational and an absolute requirement for all ocean
imports in the 4th quarter, 2008. It is likely that
the program, in its final shape, will be voluntary as early as the
2nd quarter, 2008.
Because of the similarity of the ten data elements
of the Security Filing and entry data, importers may be interested
in fulfilling both Security Filing and entry obligations at the
same time by filing 24 hours before vessel loading. CBP will
consider any comments in this regard within the context of
existing statutory schemes and technological capacity.
return to front page |
|
Upcoming
Events
Governor's
Trade Mission Going to China and Japan
Governor Jim Doyle will lead a delegation of Wisconsin business
and government leaders to China and Japan from September 7 to 19,
2007. The trade mission will provide participants with
opportunities to meet with distributors, potential customers, and
key business and government officials. The Governor will also
promote investment by Japanese and Chinese companies in Wisconsin.
The Wisconsin Department of Commerce and the Department of
Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection are jointly
coordinating the mission in partnership with the Metropolitan
Milwaukee Association of Commerce. For more information on the
trip, contact Commerce's Trade Show/Mission Coordinators Jennifer
Winner,
jennifer.winner@wisconsin.gov, ph: (608) 266-0413 or Christine
Stamm,
christine.stamm@wisconsin.gov, ph: (608) 264-7824.
CBP- ACE EXCHANGE Buffalo, NY
June 4-6, 2007
Hyatt Regency,
Two Fountain Plaza, Buffalo, New York
The ACE
Exchange is a free conference offered by Customs Border Protection
(CBP) created to provide information on ACE and allow an open
forum for communication between CBP and the trade community.
http://www.cbp.gov/linkhandler/cgov/toolbox/about/modernization/
ace/reports_briefings_events/ace_ex_conf/ace_exchange_four/ace_ex_4.ctt/ace_ex_4.pdf
Registration is
now open:
https://secure.thriva.com/Reg/Form.aspx?guid=ec2b8676-
754e-42d7-b44a-c41f5a086015-1507579-17110323110001
Proposed
Agenda:
http://www.cbp.gov/linkhandler/cgov/toolbox/about/modernization/
ace/reports_briefings_events/ace_ex_conf/ace_exchange_four/ace_5_agenda.ctt/ace_5_agenda.pdf
We recommend carriers and importers take advantage of this update
on ACE and e-Manifest. Keep in mind e-Manifest is mandatory in
several ports and announced for mandatory deployment with an
enforcement phase in the port of Buffalo, NY.
The Bureau of
Industry and Security
Outreach and
Educational Services Division
Cosponsored
by: South Georgia District Export Council
Presents "Complying
with U.S. Export Controls"
May 9-10, 2007 Savannah,
Georgia
http://www.bis.doc.gov/seminarsandtraining/SavannahGA_May_07.htm
|
|