|
CBP
Issues Tougher Guidelines for Mitigation of Penalties Involving
Removal of Goods w/o Customs Authorization or Exam
December
04, 2006
CBP has announced
new guidelines, effective December 6th, concerning the mitigation
of penalties assessed for the premature removal or delivery of
merchandise from a port without CBP authorization or examination.
CBP states that by tightening these guidelines, it is "conveying
the seriousness of its concerns to the importing community with
respect to the recurrence of these violations."
Under the new
guidelines, if CBP considers the removal or delivery of the
merchandise from the place of unlading, the terminal or the port
without CBP authorization or examination to place the security,
health or safety of the public at risk, the penalty assessment for
such violations will be mitigated as follows:
- A first
violation- upon payment of an amount equal to the lesser of 75
percent of the domestic value of the merchandise at issue or a
flat sum between $10,000 and $25,000.00
-
A second violation- upon payment of an amount equal to the lesser
of 75 percent of the domestic value of the merchandise at issue or
(2) a flat sum between $25,001 and $50,000.00
- Third or
subsequent violations0 upon payment of an amount equal to the
lesser of 75 percent of the domestic value of the merchandise at
issue or a flat sum between $50,001 and $75,000.
return to front
page
CBP - Announces Mandatory Filing of Truck Electronic Manifests
Mandatory
Filing of Truck E-Manifest to Begin in Washington, Arizona and
North Dakota
December
30, 2006
Mandatory
Filing of Truck E-Manifest to Begin in Washington, Arizona and
North Dakota
Effective January
25, 2007, truck carriers entering the United States through all
ports of entry in the states of Washington and Arizona and through
the ports of Pembina, Neche, Walhalla, Maida, Hannah, Sarles and
Hansboro in North Dakota will be required to file electronic
manifests through the Automated Commercial Environment (ACE). ACE
is the next generation of U.S. Customs and Border Protection
technology designed to protect the United States from terrorism
and to ensure the country's economic vitality by expediting lawful
trade.
This announcement
was made October 25th, 2006 in the Federal Register. (FR Doc
E6-17998). Eventually, all land border ports will be required to
transmit advance electronic truck cargo information through ACE.
Before requiring it at the ports not covered by today's notice,
CBP will provide 90 days notice through the Federal Register.
Phase II
included naming the states of Michigan and New York. An ACE
Exchange is being planned right now for the Detroit area (actual
dates to be announced- late February or beginning of March). This
is expected to coincide with the announcement and expansion of the
mandatory roll-out.
The requirement to
submit advance electronic cargo information is mandated by the
Trade Act of 2002. To comply with this requirement, truck carriers
have the following options to transmit e-manifests.
Self
file through the Web-based ACE secure data portal or via a CBP
approved electronic data interchange (EDI), or
Use third parties, which usually require a fee.
To begin filing
e-manifests with CBP, carriers are encouraged to establish an ACE
carrier account or obtain certification to file via EDI, or
contact a customs broker, service provider, or other authorized
filer to discuss how to submit e-manifests.
The e-manifest
capability is available at all ports where ACE is deployed.
For more
information (or to view Press Release issued on October 26th
(available to the public October 27th):
http://www.cbp.gov/xp/cgov/newsroom/news_releases/10262006.xml
Frequently Asked
Questions: (Updated on CBP website Dec. 29th, 2006)
http://www.cbp.gov/linkhandler/cgov/toolbox/about/modernization/ace_faq.ctt/ace_faq.doc
US CBP - Proposal for advance trade
data elements
December 21, 2006
The
advance
trade data elements proposal would, if adopted,
require submittal of a Security Filing showing, among other
things, the manufacturer name and address; the container stuffing
location; and the buyer name and address. Plans call for the
Security Filing to be the responsibility of the importer. Ocean
carriers would have to submit the vessel stow plan and container
status messages.
Read more here:
http://www.customs.gov/linkhandler/cgov/import/carriers/adv_data_elements.ctt/adv_data_elements.doc
return to front
page
Customs
to phase in new import data requirements
14 Dec 2006, CSCB
US Customs and Border Protection intends to
implement rules requiring importers to provide additional data to
identify high-risk shipments by the end of summer, 2007, but the
agency plans to phase in the "10+2" requirements to minimize their
compliance burden, Commissioner W. Ralph Basham said Wednesday.
"With these new reporting requirements, I want to be sure that all
the issue[s] that impact your business are resolved before we go
to full compliance," Basham told an audience of some 700
importers, carriers and intermediaries at the Seventh Customs
Trade Symposium.
Basham told reporters after his keynote address that Customs is
not going to implement all the data requirements at once. The
Trade Support Network met for three days before the symposium, he
said, and defining the data elements has been a major focus of
discussion.
Members of the trade who attended the meeting said that providing
data on foreign manufacturers will likely cause a greater burden
on small- and mid-size importers. Basham and Michael Mullen,
assistant commissioner for international affairs and trade
relations, said that the phased implementation is meant to
minimize the effect of providing the so-called 10+2 data.
Basham asked the symposium for its input to refine the
definitions.
"The
purpose of 10+2 is security. They are not going to be used for
compliance purposes," Basham told reporters. He said skeptics in
the trade may not believe that data would spill over to trade
enforcement. "The only way to appease our skeptics is
performance."
ICE
Arrests Two for Trafficking in Counterfeit Goods
04 Dec 2006, ST&R
Two
U.S. citizens indicted for trafficking more than $2 million in
counterfeit items were arrested by U.S. Immigration and Customs
Enforcement special agents. The goods seized included counterfeit
Nike shoes and Prada and Coach handbags.
According to ICE, counterfeiting, piracy and other intellectual
property rights violations have grown in magnitude and complexity
in recent years, costing U.S. businesses billions of dollars in
lost revenue and often posing health and safety risks to U.S.
consumers. In 1998, the International Chamber of Commerce
estimated that five to seven percent of world trade was comprised
of counterfeit goods, a market worth some $350 billion. In May
2004, the USTR’s annual Special 301 report estimated that U.S.
industry alone loses $200 to $250 billion to counterfeiting
annually.
ICE
states that the growth in IPR violations has been fueled in part
by the spread of enabling technology allowing for simple, low-cost
duplication of copyrighted products, as well as by the rise in
organized crime groups that smuggle and distribute counterfeit
merchandise for profit. In many cases these groups bankroll their
criminal activities, including illegal drug trafficking, the sale
of illegal weapons and even the possible funding of terrorist
attacks, with the profits realized from the sale of counterfeit
goods.
In
fiscal year 2005, ICE agents and U.S. Customs and Border
Protection officers made 8,022 seizures of counterfeit goods worth
$93 million, an increase from the roughly 7,225 seizures in FY
2004. Together, ICE and CBP seized roughly $700 million worth of
counterfeit goods from FY 1998 through FY 2005.
return to front
page |